[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Questioning XSL

• From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@i...>
• To: "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 13:07:13 +0100

> From: David Megginson [mailto:david@m...]
> XSL will bring exactly
> the same benefit for 1,000 pages as it will for 1,000,000 pages,
> assuming the same number of processes and document types.

Arguably, the cost-benefit of using XSL versus custom processing is greater
in the 1,000 page case than in the 1,000,000 page case, because in the
latter you can afford extra development effort to achieve better run-time
performance.

Mike

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Questioning XSL
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: SAX2: Migration strategies for option (2)
• Next by Date: RE: Questioning XSL
• Previous by thread: Re: Questioning XSL
• Next by thread: RE: Questioning XSL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread