[Question] Re: XLink: behavior must go!
This thread's sort of calmed down in the last few days, but I've been wondering something. Would it be fair to say that the behavior attribute of an XLinking element is intended to function as a sort of localized (element-context-specific) PI -- a trigger to XLink-smart processors that is ignorable by others? If so, in what way is such an attribute more problematic than actual PIs? (Btw, as I said earlier, I agree with much of what Paul Prescod said in his opening post on the thread. This is just a matter of curiosity.) ========================================================== John E. Simpson | The secret of eternal youth simpson@p... | is arrested development. http://www.flixml.org | -- Alice Roosevelt Longworth xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format