[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Do I need to use a validating parser?

  • From: "Joshua E. Smith" <jesmith@k...>
  • To: "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
  • Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 10:54:27 -0400

validating parser
More questions from the new guy...

First, an easy one: If a language is defined in XML, you would say that
language is XML-______.  Compliant?  Derived?  ish?  ey?  Compatible?

Now the harder ones...

I'm trying to choose a parser to use in my plugin.  I see a choice between
expat, which is non-validating, and will increase my download size by
<100K, and SP which is validating, and will increase my download size by
about 1MB.  Gak.

I suppose that the validation should really be done a priori by the content
developer using a validating editor, so doing validation in my plugin is
really unnecessary.  Is that true?

Do commercial validating XML editors exist yet?

I also suppose that my DTD is going to be pretty big by the time it's done,
and downloading it every time someone wants to use my plugin is kind of
stupid.  Right?  So that's another reason NOT to use a validating parser.

I think I'm starting to understand why they went to the trouble of
distinguishing well-formed from valid.

But in my reading  [XML Specification Guide: Graham, Quin, 1999], it
appears that non-validating parsers are allowed to ignore tons of stuff.
Is there ANY documentation of what expat actually *does*?  (For that
matter, is there any documentation at all?)  I assume it ignores external
entities, right?  That means I can't rely on putting boilerplate (think C
#include files) into an external parsed general entity if I go with expat,

If you were using a programming language which is XML-ish, what XML
features would you be annoyed to see left out (substitution of entities is
an obvious one, which I've seen 3DML slammed for)?  Of those features,
which does expat not do (and therefore I'll have to do in my application,
or extend expat to do -- three cheers for open source!)?

I'd rather not have any DLLs hanging around with my plugin -- do any of you
have experience linking xmltok and xmlparse statically under Win32?  Any
surprises, or tricks I need to know about?

I have another related question, but I'll post it separately.

Thanks in advance for any insights!!!!

-Joshua Smith

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.