[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SAX2 RFD: Inheritance vs. Modification vs. Amalgamation

• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 16:33:12 -0400

Don Park wrote:


> If the client supports SAX2 only, then they can invoke Parser directly.
> If the client supports both SAX and SAX2, then they can invoke the static
> helper methods in the helper class which handles things like
> NoSuchMethodException.
> 
> They should be passing an instance of the parser to the static helper
> methods.

By using a dynamic helper class, the rest of the application doesn't
need to know or care if this is a SAX2 or SAX1 parser.  See Miles's
and my messages on the subject.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: SAX2 RFD: Inheritance vs. Modification vs. Amalgamation
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>

• Prev by Date: RE: SAX2 RFD: Inheritance vs. Modification vs. Amalgamation
• Next by Date: SAX2: Namespace separators
• Previous by thread: RE: SAX2 RFD: Inheritance vs. Modification vs. Amalgamation
• Next by thread: Re: SAX2 RFD: Inheritance vs. Modification vs. Amalgamation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread