Re: What is W3C's official position on use of PI?
> As I said in that message, the important thing about processing > instructions is that they are invisible to content models. If XML Schemas > invented a way to make elements invisible to content models (like SGML's > inclusion exceptions, but maybe only allowed at the top level) and a way > to add these inclusions to existing schemas easily then processing > instructions could be replaced by these "floating", element types. That > would be neat. I entirely agree with your opinion. Liam's view is that of concern over misuse where I am more concerned with functionality. I believe XML community can benefit from a guideline for proper use of PI as well as some mechanism for registering PI target names. Meanwhile we need to encourage HTML browsers to recognize PI so that we do not lose this important feature of XML. Best, Don Park xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format