[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Argh...Entities

• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• To: "XML Dev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 04:05:59 +1000

From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

>If we are to have validatable ENTITY/ENTITIES attributes, then
>we must have unparsed entity declarations as well.  Either
>lose both or keep both, say I.

IMHO internal entities should be remapped to use URIs:
    <!ENTITY blah "blah">
should become

    <entity name="blah" system="#XPTR=ID(xml-entity:blah)" />
    <xml id="xml-entity:blah">blah</xml>

The entity mechanism is not so useful in XML, given that it duplicates
the logical interface to storage already provided by URI/MIME/HTTP.

There should be no way to specify entities used directly (e.g. used as
&xxx;) in XSchema. The existing declarations should be kept as they are
and left to wither or grow naturally as XLinks become available.

Rick Jelliffe






xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: New schema spec
• Next by Date: Entities and Expat (was Re: Confused about & in entity literal)
• Previous by thread: Re: Argh...Entities
• Next by thread: RE: Argh...Entities
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread