RE: Overloaded URIs must GO!
Didier PH Martin writes: > David, I participated to the URN elaboration within IETF auspices. If you go > the IETF official RFC repository you'll find that the RFC 2141 defining URNs > is posted since already at least more than a year. So URNs are as real as > XML is and because it is the byproduct of IETF probably created in a more > democratic way than XML itself. Also, an other RDF has been created to > specify how URNs are resolved with DNS. Bottom line there is an > authoritative specification: RFC 2141. The problem is that there are no authoritative specifications for any URN namespaces except the IETF one. If I wanted to use a URN for an XML Namespace today, how would I construct it without using an x-* URN namespace? All the best, David -- David Megginson david@m... http://www.megginson.com/ xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format