[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: BizTalk.org Press Release

• From: "Carl Hage" <carl@c...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 16:15:58 -0800

I don't understand why BizTalk was created. To me, this looks like 
a reinvention of email, but using XML tags and proprietary naming 
systems instead of RFC-822/MIME headers with the Internet 
DNS system for message exchange naming and routing.

>From my reading of the spec-- BizTalk is not just a repository-- it's 
a non-standard email scheme. All BizTalk XML documents require 
a wrapper analogous to RFC822 headers.

Rather than use a scheme incompatible with existing messaging 
systems, the IETF-EDI approach to utilizing existing Internet 
standards should be used to exchange XML messages with 
signatures and receipts. BizTalk, xml.org, etc. should be 
standardizing the message content (or really standardizing the way 
to _document_ the message definitions), not defining a new 
incompatible messaging infrastructure.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl Hage                                              C. Hage Associates
<mailto:carl@c...> Voice/Fax: 1-408-244-8410      1180 Reed Ave #51
<http://www.chage.com/chage/>                          Sunnyvale, CA 94086

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: Lotsa laughs
• Next by Date: RE: Why Lynx-compatibility matters (was RE: Lotsa laughs)
• Previous by thread: RE: BizTalk.org Press Release
• Next by thread: BizTalk.org and XML.org
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread