Re: Benchmark of 6 XML parsers on Linux
Interesting article. The speed increase you saw as the Java parser ate bigger documents was probably due to the JIT compiler, dontchathink? I wonder what would happen if you compiled the JIT down to machine code, rather than p-code (like you can with Symantec's tools on x86). It'd then be interesting to see how the Java implementation compares to the C ones. I also wonder how much of the Perl time is spent starting the interpreter. Since the primary use of Perl to munch XML is going to be in a web server environment, I would expect it to be done using a technique like the .PLX thing my sysadmin guy did on our NT machine (I don't know exactly how that worked, but it somehow eliminated lots of process startup time and made all our Perl scripts run much, much faster). -Joshua Smith xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format