RE: Weighing in on XSL / Standards
> Gak, what a thought. Can we really use tools that differ by > a complexity of 100 from other tools? Consider the idea of > a programming language 100 times simpler than C, or 100 times > more complex than Standard C++. Can the mind really grasp > such a thing? Remember PL/I? (My mind couldn't grasp it, but I guess others could). The SQL 1986 standard was 104 pages long. The 1992 standard was 607 pages. I don't have a final copy of SQL3 but my draft copy (a couple of years old) is 1270 pages. What's the ratio for XML:SGML? Mike Kay xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format