Re: SAX2 and XSLT processors
Oren Ben-Kiki writes: > I perfectly agree that the same problem exists for all relevant W3C > recommendations. IMVHO, it is wrong to specify such features using > http://my.own.company/... URIs. It would be very much in the spirit > of SAX to specify them under http://xml.org/... instead. The trouble is that we've created a centralized registry bottleneck -- a single person has to approve every new feature and property name to avoid name collision. Except for a few core SAX2 features and properties (and there may already be too many), I think that there are great advantages to letting the market decide what to use, and then (slowly) migrating feature names into the core if there's great enough demand. All the best, David -- David Megginson david@m... http://www.megginson.com/ xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format