RE: SAX2 RFD: Inheritance vs. Modification vs. Amalgamation
Err ... I might be losing my sanity here, but I _thought_ I'd posted a description of a technique that allows us to have the best of all worlds (forwards and backwards compatibility with new methods added to Parser, and no ugly casting or catching of NoSuchMethodErrors) in my last contribution to the 'Parser2 considered harmful' thread, http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/9905/0425.html Didn't it propagate? Didn't it make sense? I'd be happy to elaborate if it wasn't all that clear. Cheers, Miles -- Miles Sabin Cromwell Media Internet Systems Architect 5/6 Glenthorne Mews +44 (0)181 410 2230 London, W6 0LJ msabin@c... England xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format