[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Overloaded URIs must GO!

• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• To: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
• Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 09:19:46 -0500

Andrew Layman wrote:
> 
> Regarding the discussion on non-retrievable URIs, you may want to look into
> the URN spec, and more generally, at the paper "Naming and Addressing: URIs,
> URLs, ... " at http://www.w3.org/Addressing/.

I am not so upset about non-retrivable URIs in general as non-retrievable
*URLs*. 

http://www.w3.org/Addressing/URL/url-spec.txt

"This document specifies a Uniform Resource Locator (URL), the syntax and
semantics of formalized information for **location and access of resources
on the Internet.**"

Furthermore, that document defines the http:-syntax URL as being tied to
the HTTP protocol which it clearly is not when it is abused as in 

xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/XSL/Transform/1.0"

I haven't yet heard a defense (credible or otherwise) of this nasty and
non-intuitive practice. If you don't want your URI to be locatable and
retrievable on the Internet then *please do not use the URL syntax!*

-- 
 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
 http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

Alabama's constitution is 100 years old, 300 pages long and has more than
600 amendments. Highlights include "Amendment 393: Amendment of Amendment
No.  351", "Validation of Laws Regulating Court Costs in Randolph County",
"Miscegenation laws", "Bingo Games in Russell County", "Suppression
of dueling".  - http://www.legislature.state.al.us/ALISHome.html

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • re: Overloaded URIs must GO!
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• References:
  • RE: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
    • From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>

• Prev by Date: DTD confusion (was Re: Lotsa laughs)
• Next by Date: re: Overloaded URIs must GO!
• Previous by thread: RE: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
• Next by thread: re: Overloaded URIs must GO!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread