[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: auto/embed is not node transclusion

• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Sat, 15 May 1999 13:46:53 -0500

Robert Stretch wrote:
> 
> The difference between transclusion and inclusion is that the context of the
> transcluded content is still retained. In Nelson's application model,
> transclusions opened a viewport that was nested inside your document. This
> way you could scroll above and below the transcluded content to see its
> original context.

Thanks for point that out. I think that most people are more interested in
the lower-level mechanism that we would call "node-level inclusion".
Transclusion could (and arguably should) be built on top of inclusion.

<transclude href="somedox.txt">

can be transformed into:

<scollable_window>
   <include href="somedoc.txt">
</scrollable_window>

-- 
 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
 http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

Earth will soon support only survivor species -- dandelions, roaches, 
lizards, thistles, crows, rats. Not to mention 10 billion humans.
	- Planet of the Weeds, Harper's Magazine, October 1998

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: auto/embed is not node transclusion
    • From: "Robert Streich" <streich@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Again wit da AND and Repetitions
• Next by Date: RE: A milestone in XML
• Previous by thread: Re: auto/embed is not node transclusion
• Next by thread: Re: XLink: behavior must go!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread