Re: auto/embed is not node transclusion
Robert Stretch wrote: > > The difference between transclusion and inclusion is that the context of the > transcluded content is still retained. In Nelson's application model, > transclusions opened a viewport that was nested inside your document. This > way you could scroll above and below the transcluded content to see its > original context. Thanks for point that out. I think that most people are more interested in the lower-level mechanism that we would call "node-level inclusion". Transclusion could (and arguably should) be built on top of inclusion. <transclude href="somedox.txt"> can be transformed into: <scollable_window> <include href="somedoc.txt"> </scrollable_window> -- Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco Earth will soon support only survivor species -- dandelions, roaches, lizards, thistles, crows, rats. Not to mention 10 billion humans. - Planet of the Weeds, Harper's Magazine, October 1998 xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format