[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Benchmark of 6 XML parsers on Linux

• From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
• To: xml-dev@i...,perl-xml@l...
• Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 10:34:07 -0700

Interesting article! Now I'm curious to know why Perl, Python and Java are 
so much slower than the C parsers? Don't you implement the parser in C? It 
seems like this is an important function to fully optimize or it won't 
scale. FWIW, the parser built into Frontier is fully native. No script code 
executed when parsing XML. Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Benchmark of 6 XML parsers on Linux
    • From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@i...>

• References:
  • Benchmark of 6 XML parsers on Linux
    • From: Clark Cooper <coopercc@n...>

• Prev by Date: A milestone in XML
• Next by Date: RDF via XML style sheets (or 'nice model, shame about the syntax' ;-)
• Previous by thread: Benchmark of 6 XML parsers on Linux
• Next by thread: Re: Benchmark of 6 XML parsers on Linux
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread