[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML Torture Test: Parsers Fail

• From: "Chris Olds" <colds@n...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 18:50:54 -0700

I'm not so sure that IE5 is wrong in reporting an error (when unreferenced
General Entities are DTD chunks).  The XML REC says (in 4.3.2 "Well-Formed
Parsed Entities")
"An external general parsed entity is well-formed if it matches the
production labeled extParsedEnt", which is an optional TextDecl [77]
followed by 'content' [43].  Non-validating processors are not required to
read external entities, but they are not forbidden to read them if they are
not referenced.

While I don't think this is necessarily the best choice, I think it is just
that - an implementation choice.

    What have I missed?

        /cco



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML Torture Test: Parsers Fail
    • From: David Brownell <db@e...>
  • Re: XML Torture Test: Parsers Fail
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: XML Torture Test: Parsers Fail
    • From: "Richard L. Goerwitz" <richard@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Attribute-Value Normalisation
• Next by Date: About the DOM API,
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Torture Test: Parsers Fail
• Next by thread: Re: XML Torture Test: Parsers Fail
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread