[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

re: Anti-Microsoft Flames

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: "xml-dev Mailing List (E-mail)" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 4 Apr 1999 22:11:45 -0400 (EDT)

Andrew Layman writes:

 > This mailing list occasionally has messages that note some feature
 > or behavior of a Microsoft product, observe that it conflicts with
 > the author's opinion on how the world should be organized, and
 > impute some fiendish, nefarious and usually obscure motive to
 > Microsoft.  I don't generally comment on these. That does not mean
 > that I believe they have merit; rather that I am very busy working
 > with Satan and the International Trilateral Commission on an
 > enigmatic master plan for global domination.

Perhaps Andrew is unaware of the XML-Dev policy that silence
automatically indicates agreement in any discussion (hence the number
of substantially-identical postings on nearly every topic).

By the way, I checked the GUID embedded by Outlook in the whitespace
of Andrew's message, and it seems actually to have come from a hacker
in New Jersey.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Anti-Microsoft Flames
    • From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML TreeDiff algorithm ??
• Next by Date: Re: IE5.0 does not conform to RFC2376
• Previous by thread: Anti-Microsoft Flames
• Next by thread: Re: Anti-Microsoft Flames
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread