[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: multiple encoding specs (Re: IE5.0 does not conform to RFC2376)

• From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@e...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 13:54:49 -0400

>  >An alternative method for achieving the same result is to use a filter
> >(this can be done in Apache and in Jigsaw) which automatically emits the
> >correct charset parameter based on reading the encoding declaration in
> >the XML instance.
> 
> I think this is the approach that, ultimately, we all are 
> hoping will be deployed.

I'm not keen on this approach, but it would be a step in the right
direction. I have some servlets for doing this, and for also handling
the *.mim type.

I still dislike the encoding information in the PI.... as you noted
there are 3 levels at which mistakes can be made, and the PI means
that you might have to "fix" the document in the face of transcoding.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: multiple encoding specs (Re: IE5.0 does not conform to RFC2376)
    • From: Chris Lilley <chris@w...>

• References:
  • multiple encoding specs (Re: IE5.0 does not conform to RFC2376)
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Torture Test: Parsers Fail
• Next by Date: State Machines; IBM's XMI?
• Previous by thread: Re: multiple encoding specs (Re: IE5.0 does not conform to RFC2376)
• Next by thread: Re: multiple encoding specs (Re: IE5.0 does not conform to RFC2376)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread