[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: DOM - Creating Documents

• From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 12:41:38 +0100

> The problem is that, in the abscence of the whole
> CORBA infrastructure, there's no way getting hold of a
> concrete instance of a CORBA interface (unless you've
> already got one that defines a factory method ... but
> then we're on the first step of an infinite regress).

Erm, so you're saying that 

interface Document : Node {
	Document	createDocument{} raises {DOMException}
}

isn't valid CORBA syntax and so thats why its not been 
included?

Surely the use of IDL is to provide a clear language 
neutral specification and not limit that specification 
in anyway, nor tie it to a CORBA infrastructure. The 
OpenXML parser, and the SAXON interface mentioned 
in an earlier post, both manage to create new Document 
instances so obviously there is a means of doing it.

Are potential implementation difficulties actually 
driving the format of the specification (i.e. interface).
Seems a roundabout way of doing it if it is.

Perhaps I'm missing something. 

L.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: DOM - Creating Documents
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• References:
  • RE: DOM - Creating Documents
    • From: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: DOM - Creating Documents
• Next by Date: RE: DOM - Creating Documents
• Previous by thread: RE: DOM - Creating Documents
• Next by thread: Re: DOM - Creating Documents
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread