[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SUMMARY: XML Validation Issues (was: several threads)

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: Chris Lilley <chris@w...>, xsl-list@m...
• Date: Thu, 08 Apr 1999 08:22:19 -0700

At 01:38 AM 4/7/99 +0200, Chris Lilley wrote:

I mostly agree with Chris, but a couple of notes.

>True, but the assertion was made that validation should never be
>required because of the performance load (compared to parsing the dtd
>including external subsets, but not validating). Which implies, if there
>were negligible performance load, them whould validation be a desirable
>thing?

It still depends.  In lots of scenarios, validation isn't worth even
an extra 1% investment in time.  In lots of scenarios, there's no DTD!
Having said that, a guaranteed-lightweight validation protocol would
be nice.

>I didn't like it much either, but it seemed to be, on inspection, what
>the XML spec said.
>James Clark seemed to agree, which was a good sign. But I recently heard
>Tim Bray and CMSQ say that no, it doesn't mean that at all 

What the spec itself says is more important than what any of us
individuals say.  I really don't think you can find justification
in the spec for the notion that the existence of a <!DOCTYPE is
a signal requiring any kind of action.

>(not to UI designers, provide two
>separate icons for "validate" and "check wf" )

Yes!  IE5 has a nice validation capability, but no way (that I've 
found) for the user to invoke it.  Is there one?

>Next question, should there be (in other words, is this something that
>should be in the document instance).

Good question; I can see both sides.  But in fact, Chris, I think what's
motivating you here is less a concern for forcing validation than a 
concern for forcing the use of the external DTD for entity declarations
& attribute defaults and so on.  Which is fine; but I think there are
2 separate questions here:

 - should a document be able to ask for validation
 - should a document be able to ask for guaranteed reading of all
   external entities

Related but distinct. -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • XSL as XML transformation
    • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>
  • Re: SUMMARY: XML Validation Issues (was: several threads)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Megginson and XMLNews
• Next by Date: Re: SUMMARY: XML Validation Issues (was: several threads)
• Previous by thread: Re: SUMMARY: XML Validation Issues (was: several threads)
• Next by thread: Re: SUMMARY: XML Validation Issues (was: several threads)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread