• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: Peter Zingg <Pzingg@i...>, "'xml-dev@i...'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 09:58:40 -0800

At 09:20 AM 3/26/99 -0800, Peter Zingg wrote:
>Let's say I develop software primarily for the Windows platform...
>  Why
>wouldn't I want to use the XML Data-derived schema language, data typing,
>etc., that Microsoft is using in Office 2000 and Internet Explorer 5?  
...
>What would you do if you wanted to commit to a company-wide XML strategy
>today?

Use DTDs; they will help with a small percentage of your business-logic
validation and you'll have to write code to do the rest.  When next-gen
schemas come along, they'll cover a somewhat larger portion of your
business-logic validation in a nice declarative way, and you'll be
able to retire some of your code.  But not all.  -Tim


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Why doesn't XML have Bag?
• Next by Date: Re: Why doesn't XML have Set?
• Previous by thread: re: Maybe a naive question about XML Data
• Next by thread: RE: Maybe a naive question about XML Data
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread