• From: "Buss, Jason A" <jabuss@c...>
• To: "'Matthew Sergeant (EML)'" <Matthew.Sergeant@e...>
• Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 09:44:55 -0600

I thought the tag minimization syntax (</>) was a part of the XML
recommendation...  Or am I wrong?

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Matthew Sergeant (EML) [SMTP:Matthew.Sergeant@e...]
> 
> My problem with XML-QL was their use of tag minimisation (their
> proprietary
> </> syntax) means you can't parse XML-QL with an XML parser. That's
> foolish
> IMHO - if you're practically using XML already, why not reap the benefits?
> 
> 

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Whence XQL?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML DTD to relational
• Next by Date: How about changing the rules?
• Previous by thread: XML-QL (was Re: Whence XQL?)
• Next by thread: RE: Whence XQL?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread