• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: John Cowan <cowan@l...>, XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 15:15:45 -0800

At 05:59 PM 3/4/99 -0500, John Cowan wrote:

>4) Loose surrogates don't mean jack.

There's reason to believe they mean severe breakage upstream, and in
mission-critical apps are probably grounds to halt and catch fire.
Anyhow, if you're reading a character stream and one of 'em has a
value between (decimal) 55296 and 57343 inclusive, it ain't XML
any longer. (And I believe all the serious XML processors actually
enforce this particular rule). -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: I wonder ...
• Next by Date: Re: XML MULTI-Fragment Interchange?
• Previous by thread: Unicode conformance, short version
• Next by thread: Opinions requested
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread