• From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• To: "'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 22:24:15 -0500

Hi

<YourComment>
From: David Megginson <david@m...
>SGML does nothing that XML cannot do.
<YourComment>

<Reply>
By simple curiosity: Is it possible to declare an architectural instance
from an architectural form in XML by strictly following the XML 1.0 spec? I
do not mean here to simply have the architectural elements as our element
properties but to declare in the prolog the correspondance between each
markup and each architectural element.
</Reply>

Regards
Didier PH Martin
mailto:martind@n...
http://www.netfolder.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• References:
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Is this invalid?
• Next by Date: Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
• Previous by thread: Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
• Next by thread: RE: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread