Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
of all things, the "context problems" would be minimal, so long as the decoding process maps the prefixed identifiers to universal identifiers. (which as best i can surmis all the "standard" parsers do.) the application wouldn't care where they came from and any reserialization would be responsible to get its own declarations in order. [i'm not arguing for this declaration form, just noting that it doesn't make the problem any more complex.] Andrew McNaughton wrote: > > Documents resulting from queries run on the concatenated document would tend > to cause problems, as query results don't generally return the context of the > XML elements returned. This problem also applies to queries run across > multiple documents unless their DTD's are identical, which perhaps suggests > that an answer to this problem has to come from the query languages. > > Andrew McNaughton > > Marc.McDonald@D... wrote: > > So make a namespace declaration a PI and add an "not using this > > namespace anymore" PI. Then use simple occurrence scoping: > > > > Process result: > > <?XMLNS prefix="foo" uri="..."> > > <A> .... </A> > > <XMLENDNS prefix="foo"> > > xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
