[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SAX RFD: ModSAX Predefined Features

• From: David Brownell <db@e...>
• To: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@i...>
• Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 22:20:57 -0800

Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
> 
> * Bill la Forge
>
> | So that's why I'm butting in here. I think an open standards process
> | is important for individuals and small companies. We need to do what
> | we can to keep the ball rolling here.
> 
> We are certainly in heartfelt agreement here. :)

Gee, as a wage-slave working for a big company, I hope that I'm
not _too_ excluded from the discussions ... :-)

Seriously:  my personal model is a lot more akin to the original
IETF style "running code and working consensus" model than most
existing standards bodies.  I'm a lot happier with standards that
come from such a process than from ones that involve fat specs
that can't be implemented.  Writing code is generally more fun
than specs -- though an elegant spec is also a work of art!

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: SAX RFD: ModSAX Predefined Features
    • From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
  • Re: SAX RFD: ModSAX Predefined Features
    • From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX: ModSAX addition, general property query
• Next by Date: Re: SAX RFD: ModSAX Predefined Features
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX RFD: ModSAX Predefined Features
• Next by thread: Re: SAX RFD: ModSAX Predefined Features
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread