Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Lars Marius Garshol wrote: > > * Bill la Forge > > | So that's why I'm butting in here. I think an open standards process > | is important for individuals and small companies. We need to do what > | we can to keep the ball rolling here. > > We are certainly in heartfelt agreement here. :) Gee, as a wage-slave working for a big company, I hope that I'm not _too_ excluded from the discussions ... :-) Seriously: my personal model is a lot more akin to the original IETF style "running code and working consensus" model than most existing standards bodies. I'm a lot happier with standards that come from such a process than from ones that involve fat specs that can't be implemented. Writing code is generally more fun than specs -- though an elegant spec is also a work of art! - Dave xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
