[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • To: "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 14:43:52 -0500

At 01:01 PM 3/12/99 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
>James Clark made a convincing case for separating the inclusion of
>external general entities for the inclusion of external parameter
>entities.  Can anyone make a convincing case for separating the
>inclusion of external parameter entities from the inclusion of the
>external DTD subset?

We appear to be leapfrogging each other's messages.  See my argument in my
previous message at
http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/9903/0336.html.

I present one case, though basically I'll admit that it comes down to:
"The spec calls these two different things.  Let's continue to call them
two different things to minimize confusion and maximize flexibility."

Simon St.Laurent
XML: A Primer / Building XML Applications (April)
Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies
http://www.simonstl.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member