• From: Chris Maden <crism@o...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 13:17:36 -0500 (EST)

[Elliotte Rusty Harold]
> "Empty-element tags may be used for any element which has no
> content, whether or not it is declared using the keyword EMPTY. For
> interoperability, the empty-element tag must be used, and can only
> be used, for elements which are declared EMPTY."
> 
> Is there any way out of this conundrum?

See the definition of "for interoperability" in §1.2.

-Chris
-- 
<!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN">
<!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN"
"<URL>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/ <TEL>+1.617.499.7487
<USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek>

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • empty tags and the XMl 1.0 spec
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ModSAX: Proposed Core Features
• Next by Date: RE: empty tags and the XMl 1.0 spec
• Previous by thread: empty tags and the XMl 1.0 spec
• Next by thread: Re: empty tags and the XMl 1.0 spec
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread