• From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• To: "len bullard" <cbullard@h...>, "Jarle Stabell" <jarle.stabell@d...>
• Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 11:40:00 -0500

From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>
>Darn.  Maybe LISP was the right language after all and forty years 
>of computer scientists just didn't "get it".


Lisp and XML have a few things in common, like being easy to
determine if they are well formed. Frankly, I think XML will be
better in the long run because it can be validated against various
schema.

Bill


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Namespaces and DTDs
    • From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>
  • RE: Namespaces and DTDs
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>

• Prev by Date: Oedipus XML (was Re: Namespaces and DTDs)
• Next by Date: Re: One more ModSax naming try...
• Previous by thread: Re: Oedipus XML (TIe Your Mother Down)
• Next by thread: RE: Namespaces and DTDs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread