• From: MikeDacon@a...
• To: david@m...
• Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 17:58:22 EST

Hi David,

In a message dated 3/8/99 5:38:55 PM Eastern Standard Time,
david@m... writes:
> Think of the URI a statement of ownership.  Assume that my ISP is
>  host.net, and that I've been allocated 5MB of web space at
>  http://host.net/foo/.
>  

This is the primary reason I disagree with using a URI.  
A feature is not a resource.  Also, a standard interface to a set 
of features is not the place to invoke ownership priviledges.
You can't own a feature that you expect others to implement.

Unless I am not getting your idea of a feature, your logic seems
incorrect.

Interesting discussion and process (well worth it),

 - Mike (mdaconta@a...)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX: ModSAX addition, general property query
    • From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX RFD: ModSAX Predefined Features
• Next by Date: Re: SAX: ModSAX addition, general property query
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX: ModSAX addition, general property query
• Next by thread: Re: SAX: ModSAX addition, general property query
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread