• From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@e...>
• To: "'XML Developers' List'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 10:53:54 -0500

> >Do we really need to know about CDATA sections 
> 
> Debatable perhaps, but supported by the DOM. (Anyone know why?)
> But I'd really like to see better SAX/DOM integration, so Yes!

CDATA sections *are* different from normal text, even if only 
because the author used them. Note the interface inheritance in
the DOM that tries to hide the distinction for those that need 
not see it.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: SAX2 RFD: LexicalHandler draft v.1.1
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• References:
  • Re: SAX2 RFD: LexicalHandler draft v.1.1
    • From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>

• Prev by Date: RE: DOM Implemetation in C?
• Next by Date: null document value
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX2 RFD: LexicalHandler draft v.1.1
• Next by thread: RE: SAX2 RFD: LexicalHandler draft v.1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread