• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: <Marc.McDonald@D...>
• Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 06:57:52 -0500 (EST)

Marc.McDonald@D... writes:

 > I would suggest that the application should specify the DTD that the 
 > document is parsed by. After all, the document is supposed to conform 
 > to the application so you shouldn't have the document define what it 
 > means to conform (i.e. the DTD to use).
 > 
 > Perhaps extend SAX so that there is an API to specify a DTD to 
 > override the documents?

If people want to experiment with this kind of thing, the API formerly 
known as SAX provides the framework they need to do it; however, I am
not willing to create core features to trigger non-conformant
behaviour, however good the case in its favour.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: ModSAX: Proposed Core Features (heretical?)
    • From: <Marc.McDonald@D...>

• Prev by Date: RE: What a tangled web!!! XML and related specs
• Next by Date: Extending Mozilla Tutorial
• Previous by thread: RE: ModSAX: Proposed Core Features (heretical?)
• Next by thread: Re: ModSAX: Proposed Core Features (heretical?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread