• From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• To: <MikeDacon@a...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 07:32:34 -0500

From: MikeDacon@a... <MikeDacon@a...>
>So, one other way to go is the "Add-on" theme that David expressed.
>
>XtraSax
>XtraParser
>
>This is a combination of "add-on", "extra" and Xml.  


What about open? OpenParser/OpenSAX.
With the new extensions, we are not constrained by the interface--its quite "open".

Bill


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: One more ModSax naming try...
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: RDF not conforming to the Namespace spec?
• Next by Date: Re: ModSAX: Proposed Core Features
• Previous by thread: One more ModSax naming try...
• Next by thread: Re: One more ModSax naming try...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread