• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>, "'xml-dev@i...'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 09:51:51 -0800

At 08:54 PM 3/25/99 +0000, Dan Brickley wrote:
>Quite so. But there are still initiatives such as 
>
>	http://www.wapforum.org/docs/technical.htm
>	http://www.wapforum.org/docs/technical1.1/WBXML-03-Feb-1999.pdf

I read some of it, and if you buy the idea that a binary form of XML
is useful, it seems quite sensible.  I'm agnostic; if they think they
need it who are we to tell them they don't?  Obviously it has to
round-trip with plain ole XML. -T.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Is there anyone working on a binary version of XML?
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@m...>

• Prev by Date: DTD Catalogs
• Next by Date: RE: XML and (K)Office
• Previous by thread: Re: Is there anyone working on a binary version of XML?
• Next by thread: RE: Is there anyone working on a binary version of XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread