• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 16:04:28 -0500 (EST)

roddey@u... writes:

 > Ok, so I'm running through the James Clark tests with my new parser and I
 > don't exactly understand why not-wf\sa\081.xml is not well formed
 > necessarily. Here is the text:
 > 
 >    <!DOCTYPE doc [
 >    <!ENTITY e SYSTEM "nul">
 >    ]>
 >    <doc a="&e;"></doc>

External entities references are not allowed in attribute values.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Why is this JC test not-wf?
    • From: roddey@u...

• Prev by Date: RE: How to ??
• Next by Date: Re: How to ??
• Previous by thread: Why is this JC test not-wf?
• Next by thread: Re: Why is this JC test not-wf?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread