Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
I also vote no to package renaming. While it works, it causes confusion in practice and in discussions. Don Park Docuverse -----Original Message----- From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...> To: xml-dev@i... <xml-dev@i...> Date: Monday, March 15, 1999 8:34 AM Subject: RE: Are we ready to resolve the Mod??SAX name? >John Cowan wrote: > >> Bill la Forge wrote: >> >> > This would force the use of fully qualified names and create >> > name conflicts for programmers used to simply importing >> > the classes being used. >> >> I suppose if you use "import org.xml.sax.*;" then you have >> a problem, yes, because you can't just add "import org.xml.opensax.*;" >> to it. But if you import individual class names it's no problem: >> if you use opensax.Parser, you never need to refer to sax.Parser >> any more, since it is subsumed. > >Without even considering the technical merit, this strikes me as a good way >encourage unsuspecting programmers to introduce errors. I vote no. > >-- Ron Bourret > > >xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... >Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 >To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; >(un)subscribe xml-dev >To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; >subscribe xml-dev-digest >List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...) > > xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
