Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Lars Marius Garshol scripsit: > This terminology is also used in Common Lisp and Python, and probably > many other places as well. It was born in the LISP environment, where atoms were "interned on the OBLIST" to make them unique. > However, then we need to define the element stack interface and what > should be included there. Just the elements? Elements and attributes? > Elements, attributes and sibling number? Which entity each element > comes from? Just the element types, IMHO. This is very easy to expose as Strings for almost any kind of parser. If you want more, do it yourself. > Maybe this should be done outside the SAX core? It certainly can be, but the parser is already doing it, and why reinvent the wheel? -- John Cowan cowan@c... e'osai ko sarji la lojban. xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
