• From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• To: "David Megginson" <david@m...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 15:50:08 -0500

What about sequential reuse of a parser? 
If its going to process the same DTD again, couldn't it
have cached the DTD?

And wouldn't a DTD event stream preclude this important optimization?

B


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: SAX2: Proposed alternative DTD interface
• Next by Date: half-baked parsers vs binary XML
• Previous by thread: RE: SAX2: Proposed alternative DTD interface
• Next by thread: SAX2: Proposed alternative DTD interface
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread