• From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 06:59:54 -0500

Why doesn't XML support the notion of an unordered list of elements,
i.e., a Bag?  Perhaps this is a limitation of DTD, not XML?  That is,
DTDs do not support Bags, but XML has no such inherent limitation?  Does
DCD support Bags?  /Roger


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Why doesn't XML have Bag?
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: Why doesn't XML have Bag?
    • From: "Betty L. Harvey" <harvey@e...>
  • RE: Why doesn't XML have Bag?
    • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>

• References:
  • RE: Is there anyone working on a binary version of XML?
    • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>
  • Re: Is there anyone working on a binary version of XML?
    • From: Alberto Reggiori <alberto.reggiori@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Is there anyone working on a binary version of XML?
• Next by Date: RE: Why doesn't XML have Bag?
• Previous by thread: Re: Is there anyone working on a binary version of XML?
• Next by thread: RE: Why doesn't XML have Bag?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread