• From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>
• To: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 05:46:32 -0600

James Robertson wrote:
> 
> Although I was thinking SAX eXtended, ie:
> 
>         SAXX
> 
> This could later become
> 
>         SAXXX
> 
> or perhaps:
> 
>           3
>        SAX

At which point the local firewall chokes again, 
tosses up the warning message about unacceptable 
sites and local policies, accounts get flagged, 
and the whole nine yards of censorial software 
and American puritanism kicks in.

Call it Sax++. Incrementally better.  ;-)

len

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: ModSAX: Proposed Core Features
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: ModSAX: Proposed Core Features
    • From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespaces and DTDs
• Next by Date: RDF not conforming to the Namespace spec?
• Previous by thread: Re: ModSAX: Proposed Core Features
• Next by thread: RE: ModSAX: Proposed Core Features
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread