• From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@e...>
• To: "'XML Developers' List'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 14:23:06 -0500

> >By the same argument,
> ><p
> >x="1">
> >and 
> ><p x="1">
> >are different...
> 
> David is right.  It's too late now, because DOM level 1 wrote 
> CDATA sections into the spec so we're stuck with 'em - it's a
> pity we didn't have the infoset back then. (I assume it won't
> include them, right David?) -T.

I think CDATA is a religious issue. Some people love them, some
people hate them. Deal with it.

They are currently in the InfoSet as a property of characters.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: SAX2 RFD: LexicalHandler draft v.1.1
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Whence XQL?
• Next by Date: Re: SAX2: DTDDeclHandler (minimalist position)
• Previous by thread: RE: SAX2 RFD: LexicalHandler draft v.1.1
• Next by thread: RE: SAX2 RFD: LexicalHandler draft v.1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread