• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: roddey@u..., xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 12:42:14 -0800

At 12:22 PM 3/17/99 -0700, roddey@u... wrote:
>
>
>
>Ok, so I'm running through the James Clark tests with my new parser and I
>don't exactly understand why not-wf\sa\081.xml is not well formed
>necessarily. Here is the text:
>
>   <!DOCTYPE doc [
>   <!ENTITY e SYSTEM "nul">
>   ]>
>   <doc a="&e;"></doc>

It's not WF because there is a specific prohibition against referring
to external entities in attribute values. -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Why is this JC test not-wf?
• Next by Date: Re: How to ??
• Previous by thread: Re: Why is this JC test not-wf?
• Next by thread: Re: Why is this JC test not-wf?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread