Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Marcelo Cantos wrote: > Furthermore, inter-document dependenies are not a fundamental problem > for parallelisation. Threads can talk to each other and block waiting > for other threads to finish parsing, while allowing other threads to > continue independent tasks. You are suggesting that because in some > cases it isn't trivial to parallelise we should therefore never even > allow the possibility of such a thing to occur. I was not suggesting that. I merely said that in the general case, knowing how to parallelize requires looking at the data in the stream. I propose that this data, like everything else, be stored in XML and that before doing anything else, the endpoint ought to parse it. I'm sorry if I gave the impression that I think XP is the solution to everything. I merely think it would be useful for a lot of things. If you're judging it on the criteria of being able to accomplish something that was impossible before, I'm not surprised you're disappointed. xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
