• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: Alison Lennon <alison@r...>
• Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 18:54:17 -0800

At 12:45 PM 3/30/99 +1000, Alison Lennon wrote:
>Is it likely to be included in later versions of XML? 

Not impossible.  There are some people on the schema group who'd like
to bring it back.  But by no means a sure thing.

>In other words,
>what are the options for applications which need to use unordered
>lists - SGML?

Yep.  Or write your own code to validate the unordered-list elements;
since any nontrivial business application is going to need some extra
validation logic past what the DTD can do anyhow, this is probably
not too burdensome.

Another approach is to generate your documents in such a way that
you sort the unordered-list elements by any old criterion at all,
so that they become ordered-list elements; then use a simpler
content model. -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Ampersand connector in XML
• Next by Date: Re: A Line in the Declarative Syntax Sand(Was: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG))
• Previous by thread: Re: Ampersand connector in XML
• Next by thread: XML <-> non-XML filter project
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread