[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
  • To: "Paul Prescod" <paul@p...>,"'XML-DEV'" <xml-dev@i...>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 04:32:51 +0800

>In general there are very few answers in the spec. about what is
>"significant" or not. Where does it say that element order is significant?
>That's what the infoset group is all about.
>
>I would say that everything should be presumed significant until the
>infoset group says otherwise.


This also relates to the XML Canonicalization work. The order is significant
if it is preserved under canonicalization.

James
(not speaking for the canonicalization work)


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member