• From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• To: "xml-dev@i..." <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 11:04:15 +0100

the third parameter (the DTD) is ill advised. one will, in any case, need to
establish scoping rules for the bindings. such rules, in combination with
xml's existing reference and sequence mechanisms, would render the third
parameter either redundant or too restrictive.

Marc.McDonald@D... wrote:
> 
> For a more complete solution than the option (emphasize option) of a
> DTD associated with a namespace prefix and URI, I would add the means
> to declare a namespace, prefix and DTD in a DTD.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Namespaces and DTDs
    • From: "Richard L. Goerwitz" <richard@g...>

• References:
  • RE: Namespaces and DTDs
    • From: <Marc.McDonald@D...>

• Prev by Date: RE: DocumentHandler with xml4j DOMParser
• Next by Date: ModSAX: Proposed Core Features
• Previous by thread: RE: Namespaces and DTDs
• Next by thread: Re: Namespaces and DTDs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread