• From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@k...>
• To: "'XML-DEV'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 14:03:02 -0800

The RDF syntax spec states that "The RDF element is optional if the content can be known to be RDF from the application context." 

Can anyone clarify exactly what is meant by "application context"? 

Jeff

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Kuantech, Inc.                            http://www.kuantech.com
Jeffrey E. Sussna, Principal                     jes@k...

Distributed Content Architectures for Dynamic Online Applications
-----------------------------------------------------------------


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • re: RDF considered optional
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: RDF considered optional
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XCatalog
• Next by Date: Re: RDF considered optional
• Previous by thread: Re: XCatalog
• Next by thread: Re: RDF considered optional
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread