• From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@j...>
• To: "David Megginson" <david@m...>, "'XML-DEV'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 10:05:43 -0500

Should we just stick with ModSAX/ModParser?
Should we change to OpenSAX/OpenParser?

I think we are down to these two possibilities. The other
possibilities were not well received (variants on ExLax,
Scream2, X-Files).

David has been a driving force here and I really like what
he has done. I have no problem with his original choice in name.

The rest of ModSAX seems to be fairly well cooked. Finalizing
the name will go a long way to wrapping the whole thing up.

Bill



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • SAX: Name Vote
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: Are we ready to resolve the Mod??SAX name?
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ModSAX: Proposed Core Features
• Next by Date: Lisp concrete syntax -- was: Namespaces and DTDs
• Previous by thread: Intro message stale
• Next by thread: Re: Are we ready to resolve the Mod??SAX name?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread