• From: Tom Harding <tomh@t...>
• To: "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 14:00:56 -0800

David Megginson wrote:

> As I wrote before, it doesn't much matter whether we use Java property
> names incorporating domain names (like
> 'org.xml.sax.features.validation') or URIs (like
> 'http://xml.org/sax/features/validation'), as long as we have the
> ability for people to create new names without fear of collision.

I would also urge against using an http: URI since it is not meant that a resource actually be
retrieved using the http protocol.




xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Naming ModSAX features: good use for the 'java:' URI scheme?
    • From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>
  • Re: SAX: ModSAX addition, general property query
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• References:
  • Re: SAX: ModSAX addition, general property query
    • From: MikeDacon@a...
  • Re: SAX: ModSAX addition, general property query
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX RFD: ModSAX Predefined Features
• Next by Date: Re: SAX RFD: ModSAX Predefined Features
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX: ModSAX addition, general property query
• Next by thread: Re: SAX: ModSAX addition, general property query
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread