[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning?

• From: roddey@u...
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 11:46:19 -0700

>As far as Namespaces is concerned, the namespace URI is a black box --
>it doesn't point to anything, and it doesn't mean anything.  The
>creator, however, is free to add internal structure:
>
>  http://www.megginson.com/ns/business/1999-01-29/
>  http://www.megginson.com/ns/business/1999-02-09/
>
>etc.
>

But that kind of raises issues regarding extensibility, right? How would
you extend a previous version, such that the old one remained intact while
the new one was a superset, without having to have them use two different
prefixes, in a situation where they both might have to coexist?

I haven't thought it out, so maybe its simple, but it seems an obvious
issue for us to thrash on for a couple weeks :-)



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Slowness of JDK 1.1.x String.intern() [was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ]
• Next by Date: InheritanceFilter improved
• Previous by thread: Re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning?
• Next by thread: RE: Word and XML (was: XML standards coherency and so forth)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread